Insurance Product Replacement Advice - A Case in PointBY TREVOR HARRIS | VOLUME 10, ISSUE 1This court case is something all risk writers and financial planners should acquaint themselves with. The human story behind the case also appeared on the ABC program 'Four ... Get articles like this delivered to your email - Sign up for the free weekly newsletter More Articles |
Latest News
Advisers should rethink portfolio construction: La Trobe
La Trobe Financial has urged advisers to broaden portfolio construction beyond traditional equity and bond allocations, arguing that slowing productivity, persistent inflation risks and changing market dynamics require greater focus on real assets and private credit.
Advice complaints see biggest increase in FY26: AFCA
Despite only accounting for less than 10% of the total complaints lodged, investment and advice complaints have seen the steepest increase in FY26, data from AFCA shows.
Acclime acquires Melbourne's Polar 993
Acclime, a provider of corporate, governance, advisory and fund services across Asia Pacific and global markets, has signed an agreement to acquire the independent trustee and fund administration business from Melbourne.
Platforms are not solution providers: AZ NGA
AZ NGA group chief executive Paul Barrett warned platforms should stay in their lane rather than overstep to improve financial adviser productivity, reiterating that it is the advice business' responsibility to do so.
Further Reading
Cover Story

Advice with soul
SACHA BURCHGART
FOUNDER AND FINANCIAL PLANNING SPECIALIST
BURCHEART
FOUNDER AND FINANCIAL PLANNING SPECIALIST
BURCHEART
Though she initially tried, Sacha Burchgart couldn't escape the call of a career in financial advice; it just took staring down her own mortality to see what's possible when you do things differently. Jamie Williamson writes.








We are going to see a lot more of this sort of thing as companies race to find faster ways to do things. These net-based applications are dynamite, give me a pen and application form any time.
You look at the client and ask, as the question does, HAVE YOU EVER?
I don't like the direction the sector is going. I believe the forms are planned to hook clients into this sort of situation, cheap rates get the premium and have every intention of declining if possible. I believe this type of application should be banned by ASIC and that we should go back to face-to-face questions.
People don't read SOA's mostly. I'm glad to see Fiduciary Duty mentioned as it seems to have been forgotten in this last couple of years with all the experts buying into our businesses. If the planner had questioned the applicant properly there would have been no business done. I don't know what goes on in the some of the bigger bancassurance groups but feel they mostly work under the threat of dismissal if they don't meet their targets.
Thanks for the article. I find it hard to believe that the application, online or not, would not have asked questions around these conditions and therefore fail to see how the app was a "cleanskin" at all.