Insurance Product Replacement Advice - A Case in PointBY TREVOR HARRIS | VOLUME 10, ISSUE 1This court case is something all risk writers and financial planners should acquaint themselves with. The human story behind the case also appeared on the ABC program 'Four ... Get articles like this delivered to your email - Sign up for the free weekly newsletter More Articles |
Latest News
NCAs unlikely to solve retirement advice gap: HUB24, CFS
HUB24 and Colonial First State (CFS) say the New Class of Advisers (NCA) will unlikely solve the retirement advice gap Australians face, noting the focus needs to be on helping reduce friction for those with complex advice needs.
Advised cover faces claims data test
Group superannuation insurance appears to outperform individual advised cover on some claim's measures, raising questions about the value of advice when it comes to protecting clients against disability.
ASIC stalls Sequoia bid to ditch cross guarantee deed
ASIC is again putting up roadblocks to Sequoia Financial Group's attempt to revoke the deed of cross guarantee with InterPrac Financial Planning, asking more questions and requesting more information before the group rids itself of all liabilities arising from the Shield and First Guardian disaster.
Praemium's new leadership toughens earnings yardstick
Praemium's new leadership will be keeping a close eye on costs, with new chief executive Denis Orrock noting he will make sure the technology upgrade underway translates into stronger earnings and better returns for shareholders.
Further Reading
Cover Story

Advice with soul
SACHA BURCHGART
FOUNDER & MANAGING DIRECTOR
BURCHEART PTY LTD
FOUNDER & MANAGING DIRECTOR
BURCHEART PTY LTD
Though she initially tried, Sacha Burchgart couldn't escape the call of a career in financial advice; it just took staring down her own mortality to see what's possible when you do things differently. Jamie Williamson writes.








We are going to see a lot more of this sort of thing as companies race to find faster ways to do things. These net-based applications are dynamite, give me a pen and application form any time.
You look at the client and ask, as the question does, HAVE YOU EVER?
I don't like the direction the sector is going. I believe the forms are planned to hook clients into this sort of situation, cheap rates get the premium and have every intention of declining if possible. I believe this type of application should be banned by ASIC and that we should go back to face-to-face questions.
People don't read SOA's mostly. I'm glad to see Fiduciary Duty mentioned as it seems to have been forgotten in this last couple of years with all the experts buying into our businesses. If the planner had questioned the applicant properly there would have been no business done. I don't know what goes on in the some of the bigger bancassurance groups but feel they mostly work under the threat of dismissal if they don't meet their targets.
Thanks for the article. I find it hard to believe that the application, online or not, would not have asked questions around these conditions and therefore fail to see how the app was a "cleanskin" at all.