A new regulator? Better empower ASICBY CHRISTOPHER PAGE | FRIDAY, 3 OCT 2014 3:36PMThe Australian financial services industry and Australia's financial advisers already have regulator dedicated to policing standards: the Australian Securities and Investments ... Upgrade your subscription to access this article
Join the growing community of financial advisers
with unlimited access to our latest news, research and analysis of the industry.
Become a premium subscriber today. |
Latest News
Advisers should rethink portfolio construction: La Trobe
La Trobe Financial has urged advisers to broaden portfolio construction beyond traditional equity and bond allocations, arguing that slowing productivity, persistent inflation risks and changing market dynamics require greater focus on real assets and private credit.
Advice complaints see biggest increase in FY26: AFCA
Despite only accounting for less than 10% of the total complaints lodged, investment and advice complaints have seen the steepest increase in FY26, data from AFCA shows.
Acclime acquires Melbourne's Polar 993
Acclime, a provider of corporate, governance, advisory and fund services across Asia Pacific and global markets, has signed an agreement to acquire the independent trustee and fund administration business from Melbourne.
Platforms are not solution providers: AZ NGA
AZ NGA group chief executive Paul Barrett warned platforms should stay in their lane rather than overstep to improve financial adviser productivity, reiterating that it is the advice business' responsibility to do so.
Further Reading
Cover Story

Advice with soul
SACHA BURCHGART
FOUNDER AND FINANCIAL PLANNING SPECIALIST
BURCHEART
FOUNDER AND FINANCIAL PLANNING SPECIALIST
BURCHEART
Though she initially tried, Sacha Burchgart couldn't escape the call of a career in financial advice; it just took staring down her own mortality to see what's possible when you do things differently. Jamie Williamson writes.









You are absolutely correct, we need a simple, streamlined environment in which the consumer can confidently seek qualified advisers that they can afford.
Over-regulation has seen the cost of advice increase to the point where the average punter can ill afford it at a time that they likely need it most.
If all the money expended on a raft of inquiry's was used to bolster the stocks of the incumbent regulator and it was held accountable we would not be wasting breathe on talk of yet another body
It is most certainly not regulation and rules we need and its not competency training. I haven't seen anyone given poor advice or effectively stolen from with excessive commissions and fees due to lack of adviser knowledge. It's simply been because the adviser was a greedy, self interested person. The only effective deterrent is far greater consequences and punishment together with wider publication of punishment. Hold the advisers accountable for any advice not in the client's best interest, just as any other professional can be.
It's really simple: speeding fines and policing work.
Without them it's not lack of knowledge or competency that causes people to speed.
Any move to reduce the FPA's industry stranglehold would be welcome. Regardless of what you perceive the value of qualification to be, advisors are like victims of the Pied Piper as a result of the FPA's aggressive market positioning and unfortunate market power. An alternative needs to be presented and I would rather pay fees to anyone than the FPA. It is about quality and professionalism, not vested interest