A new regulator? Better empower ASICBY CHRISTOPHER PAGE | FRIDAY, 3 OCT 2014 3:36PMThe Australian financial services industry and Australia's financial advisers already have regulator dedicated to policing standards: the Australian Securities and Investments ... Upgrade your subscription to access this article
Join the growing community of financial advisers
with unlimited access to our latest news, research and analysis of the industry.
Become a premium subscriber today. |
Latest News
Sequoia gives InterPrac sale a second shot
|Sequoia is trying its hand at selling InterPrac Financial Planning again after its first sale attempt to Conquest Investment Management was left in the air.
Advised clients more satisfied despite heightened costs: Report
A new report highlighting the value of financial advisers indicates clients are even more satisfied despite a higher cost of seeking advice.
First Guardian victims advance in case against InterPrac
The Federal Court has forced InterPrac Financial Planning to pay two victims of the First Guardian Master Fund that collectively lost a total $465,000.
Frontier Advisers brings Segal Macro, LCP partnership to close
Frontier Advisers, Segal Marco Advisers and Lane Clark and Peacock (LCP) have decided to bring their Global Investment Research Alliance (GIRA) to a close, after 13 years of partnership.
Further Reading
Cover Story

Advice with soul
SACHA BURCHGART
FOUNDER & MANAGING DIRECTOR
BURCHEART PTY LTD
FOUNDER & MANAGING DIRECTOR
BURCHEART PTY LTD
Though she initially tried, Sacha Burchgart couldn't escape the call of a career in financial advice; it just took staring down her own mortality to see what's possible when you do things differently. Jamie Williamson writes.









You are absolutely correct, we need a simple, streamlined environment in which the consumer can confidently seek qualified advisers that they can afford.
Over-regulation has seen the cost of advice increase to the point where the average punter can ill afford it at a time that they likely need it most.
If all the money expended on a raft of inquiry's was used to bolster the stocks of the incumbent regulator and it was held accountable we would not be wasting breathe on talk of yet another body
It is most certainly not regulation and rules we need and its not competency training. I haven't seen anyone given poor advice or effectively stolen from with excessive commissions and fees due to lack of adviser knowledge. It's simply been because the adviser was a greedy, self interested person. The only effective deterrent is far greater consequences and punishment together with wider publication of punishment. Hold the advisers accountable for any advice not in the client's best interest, just as any other professional can be.
It's really simple: speeding fines and policing work.
Without them it's not lack of knowledge or competency that causes people to speed.
Any move to reduce the FPA's industry stranglehold would be welcome. Regardless of what you perceive the value of qualification to be, advisors are like victims of the Pied Piper as a result of the FPA's aggressive market positioning and unfortunate market power. An alternative needs to be presented and I would rather pay fees to anyone than the FPA. It is about quality and professionalism, not vested interest