All fees are conflictedBY JON HOYLE | FRIDAY, 9 NOV 2018 10:16AM"All fees are conflicted. Every fee is conflicted in its own way" - Tolstoy (sort of). No financial advice topic is as emotive as how to charge fees. Opinions range from the evangelists ... Upgrade your subscription to access this article
Join the growing community of financial advisers
with unlimited access to our latest news, research and analysis of the industry.
Become a premium subscriber today. |
Latest News
Former financial adviser charged in alleged $160k super fraud case
Former financial adviser Abdullah Popal has been charged with alleged fraud offences in Sydney's north-west, accused of hoodwinking five individuals out of over $160,000 from their self-managed super funds (SMSFs).
Reducing super tax cap to $2m 'a concern': FAAA
The FAAA has voiced concerns over the Labor government's proposed superannuation tax, saying if they are negotiating with the Greens, a reduction in the cap to $2 million would be problematic.
FAAA calls for stronger consumer protections in advice reforms
The Financial Advice Association of Australia (FAAA) has opposed collective charging for "always complex and costly" retirement planning advice and emphasised the need for consumer protection in the provision of super nudges in its submission to Treasury on the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes (DBFO) ...
Adviser numbers jump in March quarter: Rainmaker
The March quarter saw the highest number of financial advisers join the sector in the last seven years to reach 15,982, according to Rainmaker Information.
Further Reading
Cover Story

Moving mountains
MAGDELINE JACOVIDES
FOUNDER AND FINANCIAL ADVISER
MAZI WEALTH
FOUNDER AND FINANCIAL ADVISER
MAZI WEALTH
On top of running a successful practice, Mazi Wealth founder Deline Jacovides is a fierce advocate for closing the superannuation gender gap and has built a highly popular social media presence that takes financial literacy to the next level. She tells Karren Vergara where her passion comes from and how she integrates it all with family life.
Common sense and logical. Is this why regulators struggle to understand it properly?
This is truthful. The politicians and their media propagandists will try to ignore the truth for as long as they can.
good un conflicted article
Excellent piece, well articulated. Thank you Jonathan.
Agree with the others.
A well thought out and articulated article.
And what would have been your response if your surgeon had offered a performance fee option?
Jonathon your article is on the money.
I've been advocating your rationale for years. No one can even tell me what the fair fee for service rate should be. Is it $100 per hour, $300 per hour? Does someone with 2 degrees charge twice as much as someone with 1 or none?
Is the advice from someone with 2 degrees twice as good as someone with 1 or none.
You brought up the conflict of billable hours and the fallacy that generates.
I raised all these issues with the FPA several years ago when this debate on Commission versus Fees for Service was going on.
My solution was quite simple.
Have a scale of fees for each service and how its paid for, becomes irrelevant.
Then which adviser is selected by the client should depend on the quality of the advice.
Isn't that the best outcome for any client?
I don't buy into the banning of commission argument. A conflict of interest exists if one product pays a higher commission than another. If commissions are the same across all products (like they are now with Life Insurance products) then there is no conflict on the basis of potential earnings for an adviser to recommend one product over another. It then comes down to product manufacturers structuring/costing their offering better than another provider.
If the regulators had gone down this road from Day 1, we wouldn't have all this political nonsense and the 'cancer' that is destroying our industry!
You are correct Jonathan.
A scale of fees for each service and how it was paid for, would make payment conflicts irrelevant.
So does this mean all fund managers and platforms will now charge a flat fee as well.....if not, that is very hypocritical. If Advisers need to change from % to $ fee, so should the rest of the industry....
As for removal of grandfathering commission, does this mean the above parties will reduce their fees as well, because after all, is this all about the consumer.....so the fund managers and the platform providers should all reduce their fees too..