Best political speech in two yearsBY PHIL ANDERSON | WEDNESDAY, 3 MAR 2021 11:36AMIn the debate on the Hayne Royal Commission Response Bill 2020 (on annual renewal) in the Senate on 25 February 2021, there was one speech that stood out head and shoulders above ... Upgrade your subscription to access this article
Join the growing community of financial advisers
with unlimited access to our latest news, research and analysis of the industry.
Become a premium subscriber today. |
Latest News
Federal Court lifts Merhi's travel ban
Former financial adviser Ferras Merhi is now free to travel as the Federal Court lifted travel restraint orders imposed one year ago.
Nominations open for the 2026 Power50
Nominations for the 2026 Financial Standard Power50 are now open as we recognise the country's most influential advisers who continue to raise the standards for the profession and provide outstanding service to clients and the wider community.
Advice veteran's exit creates $1bn Tassie wealth group
Mancell Financial Group (MFG) founder Peter Mancell has retired as a financial adviser after 46 years, selling the business he built to pave the way for a $1 billion wealth management firm in Tasmania.
Netwealth expands Morgan Stanley mandate
Amid expanding its stockbroking and private wealth capabilities, Netwealth has been picked by Morgan Stanley to provide a platform solution to its Australian wealth business.
Further Reading
Cover Story

Advice with soul
SACHA BURCHGART
FOUNDER AND FINANCIAL PLANNING SPECIALIST
BURCHEART
FOUNDER AND FINANCIAL PLANNING SPECIALIST
BURCHEART
Though she initially tried, Sacha Burchgart couldn't escape the call of a career in financial advice; it just took staring down her own mortality to see what's possible when you do things differently. Jamie Williamson writes.









Whilst I agree with the sentiments expressed Phil, opt-in is only one small area where the consequences of government policy is continuing to increase the cost for advisors to provide financial advice.
The most recently diabolic onslaught is by ASIC making a 'cost' recovery claim against advisors for them to do the job that the government tasked them with doing. They already receive taxpayer funding for applying the regulations, why then are we being levied to pay the costs of their investigation - and their litigation - against the industry. Most of us would cop it for the cost of their education and support, but to pay them to investigate a small number of the advisors is unacceptable.
Well said Senator Brockman!