Forget FoFA, there's no magic trick to professionalismBY CHRISTOPHER PAGE | TUESDAY, 25 MAR 2014 4:39PMThe Future of Financial Advice legislation has had the interesting, but increasingly frustrating virtue of resurfacing each time we all think that the debate is over. As a result ... Upgrade your subscription to access this article
Join the growing community of financial advisers
with unlimited access to our latest news, research and analysis of the industry.
Become a premium subscriber today. |
Latest News
Sequoia gives InterPrac sale a second shot
|Sequoia is trying its hand at selling InterPrac Financial Planning again after its first sale attempt to Conquest Investment Management was left in the air.
Advised clients more satisfied despite heightened costs: Report
A new report highlighting the value of financial advisers indicates clients are even more satisfied despite a higher cost of seeking advice.
First Guardian victims advance in case against InterPrac
The Federal Court has forced InterPrac Financial Planning to pay two victims of the First Guardian Master Fund that collectively lost a total $465,000.
Frontier Advisers brings Segal Macro, LCP partnership to close
Frontier Advisers, Segal Marco Advisers and Lane Clark and Peacock (LCP) have decided to bring their Global Investment Research Alliance (GIRA) to a close, after 13 years of partnership.
Further Reading
Cover Story

Advice with soul
SACHA BURCHGART
FOUNDER & MANAGING DIRECTOR
BURCHEART PTY LTD
FOUNDER & MANAGING DIRECTOR
BURCHEART PTY LTD
Though she initially tried, Sacha Burchgart couldn't escape the call of a career in financial advice; it just took staring down her own mortality to see what's possible when you do things differently. Jamie Williamson writes.









I totally agree with this article.
The intent of most legislation is to force people to do the right thing. The professionals of the financial advice industry who always provide advice in the best interests of customers will feel little impact of FOFA reforms... so why dilute them? Unlike other professions, many financial planners are employed by, or are licenced by product providers. This means that by the very nature of their remuneration they have a conflict. The customer believes they are paying for strategic advice, which the financial planner may genuinely believe they are providing - but in most instances the financial planner also has targets to meet directly related to placement of product. Unfortunately the industry is still driven by product providers, rather than independently owned practises of professional financial planners who offer strategic advice on a genuine fee-for-service basis. Only when this shifts, will we see greater recognition of our profession and a reduced need to rely on legislation to protect consumers.
Thanks for your excelelnt article Christopher, at last, the voice of reason in a world gone mad! This is exactly how we have approached these issues in our business. we have made the changes as prescribed by legislation and await the outcome of any future decisions. Meanwhile we are focussed on our clients, and are working, day by day, client by client, and always acting in our clients best interests.