In association we trustBY CHRISTOPHER PAGE | THURSDAY, 7 OCT 2010 1:16PMFinancial advisers in Australia frustrated by their associations despite there never having been so many of them should look at the Financial Planning Association in the US. Sustained ... Upgrade your subscription to access this article
Join the growing community of financial advisers
with unlimited access to our latest news, research and analysis of the industry.
Become a premium subscriber today. |
Latest News
Advisers should rethink portfolio construction: La Trobe
La Trobe Financial has urged advisers to broaden portfolio construction beyond traditional equity and bond allocations, arguing that slowing productivity, persistent inflation risks and changing market dynamics require greater focus on real assets and private credit.
Advice complaints see biggest increase in FY26: AFCA
Despite only accounting for less than 10% of the total complaints lodged, investment and advice complaints have seen the steepest increase in FY26, data from AFCA shows.
Acclime acquires Melbourne's Polar 993
Acclime, a provider of corporate, governance, advisory and fund services across Asia Pacific and global markets, has signed an agreement to acquire the independent trustee and fund administration business from Melbourne.
Platforms are not solution providers: AZ NGA
AZ NGA group chief executive Paul Barrett warned platforms should stay in their lane rather than overstep to improve financial adviser productivity, reiterating that it is the advice business' responsibility to do so.
Further Reading
Cover Story

Advice with soul
SACHA BURCHGART
FOUNDER AND FINANCIAL PLANNING SPECIALIST
BURCHEART
FOUNDER AND FINANCIAL PLANNING SPECIALIST
BURCHEART
Though she initially tried, Sacha Burchgart couldn't escape the call of a career in financial advice; it just took staring down her own mortality to see what's possible when you do things differently. Jamie Williamson writes.









For many years I have been complaining about the FPA and how it does not do enough work on behalf of its members. My opinion of the FPA is that it has an agenda to promote membership and CFP status above that of working on behalf of advisers to educate the regulators and public about what a financial planner does and the value of advice. (May I be so cynical to suggest that their agenda is monetary driven?) The FPA has continuously refused to create a resistance to the blatant lies and false information emanating from Industry Funds Superannuation. Additionally, the government and regulator activity they provide is so poor, it is laughable. No wonder that many advisers either have refused to renew their membership, or only retain membership because of CFP status! I would dearly love to have our associations work on our behalf like the US Financial Planning Association. They get enough membership money from us, so why don't they spend some of this money in areas that will benefit members?
Your comments are valid and I could not agree more
WHEN ARE THE INDEPENDENT ADVISERS GOING TO REALISE THAT THE FPA ARE 85% INSTITUTIONAL MEMBERSHIP, AND UNDERSTANDABLY, ONLY INTERESTED IN INSTITUTIONAL ISSUES. THE REASON THEY HAVE NOT COUNTED THE INDUSTRY FUND STRATEGY IS BECAUSE THE INSTOS HAVE WHOLESALE MANDATES WITH THE INDUSTRY SUPER FUNDS - SELF INTEREST!!
Have always though that an association should work for the benefits of members and stay away from running education programme that are key to the associations income and focus on promoting members to build a solid and respected industry