Medcraft's appalling speechBY CHRISTOPHER PAGE | FRIDAY, 12 DEC 2014 10:35AMI am surprised. More than that, I am astonished, shocked. Last week I was left speechless by the address that the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) chairman ... Upgrade your subscription to access this article
Join the growing community of financial advisers
with unlimited access to our latest news, research and analysis of the industry.
Become a premium subscriber today. |
Latest News
Federal Court lifts Merhi's travel ban
Former financial adviser Ferras Merhi is now free to travel as the Federal Court lifted travel restraint orders imposed one year ago.
Nominations open for the 2026 Power50
Nominations for the 2026 Financial Standard Power50 are now open as we recognise the country's most influential advisers who continue to raise the standards for the profession and provide outstanding service to clients and the wider community.
Advice veteran's exit creates $1bn Tassie wealth group
Mancell Financial Group (MFG) founder Peter Mancell has retired as a financial adviser after 46 years, selling the business he built to pave the way for a $1 billion wealth management firm in Tasmania.
Netwealth expands Morgan Stanley mandate
Amid expanding its stockbroking and private wealth capabilities, Netwealth has been picked by Morgan Stanley to provide a platform solution to its Australian wealth business.
Further Reading
Cover Story

Advice with soul
SACHA BURCHGART
FOUNDER AND FINANCIAL PLANNING SPECIALIST
BURCHEART
FOUNDER AND FINANCIAL PLANNING SPECIALIST
BURCHEART
Though she initially tried, Sacha Burchgart couldn't escape the call of a career in financial advice; it just took staring down her own mortality to see what's possible when you do things differently. Jamie Williamson writes.









Whats your answer Christopher...silence the regulator? Of course the regulator need to be in the public space. Unfortunately they don't use a big stick, perhaps relying on the ethics of the sector to get the message and improve. Apparently you don't get the message.
The regulator has the right to be angry at the nonsense uncovered in the banks. He is also correct and supported by the FSI report in getting the Corporations Act changed so that he can keep product that is rapacious out of the marketplace. for example the PDS for some Forest schemes highlighted 20% upfront commissions to accountants.
Mr Medcraft is looking at the thousands of people who have lost their life savings mostly because people thought it was OK to do them over.
You have to act in the best interests of the client and if you do not then you should resign from this industry.
If the regulator is going to look to cap the insurance market then that is market interference but if the regulator is going to review all product coming onto the market then that is a good use of the regulatory function. It is when the regulator tries to control the market that they get ultimately smashed up.