Solutions for a simpler, wellbeing-driven financial advice modelBY MATT BROWN | FRIDAY, 11 MAR 2022 8:14AM How many financial advisers does it take to change a lightbulb? It's difficult to say because three are still doing the paperwork, two must go back to university and the others ... Upgrade your subscription to access this article
Join the growing community of financial advisers
with unlimited access to our latest news, research and analysis of the industry.
Become a premium subscriber today. |
Latest News
NCAs unlikely to solve retirement advice gap: HUB24, CFS
HUB24 and Colonial First State (CFS) say the New Class of Advisers (NCA) will unlikely solve the retirement advice gap Australians face, noting the focus needs to be on helping reduce friction for those with complex advice needs.
Advised cover faces claims data test
Group superannuation insurance appears to outperform individual advised cover on some claim's measures, raising questions about the value of advice when it comes to protecting clients against disability.
ASIC stalls Sequoia bid to ditch cross guarantee deed
ASIC is again putting up roadblocks to Sequoia Financial Group's attempt to revoke the deed of cross guarantee with InterPrac Financial Planning, asking more questions and requesting more information before the group rids itself of all liabilities arising from the Shield and First Guardian disaster.
Praemium's new leadership toughens earnings yardstick
Praemium's new leadership will be keeping a close eye on costs, with new chief executive Denis Orrock noting he will make sure the technology upgrade underway translates into stronger earnings and better returns for shareholders.
Further Reading
Cover Story
Advice with soul
SACHA BURCHGART
FOUNDER & MANAGING DIRECTOR
BURCHEART PTY LTD
FOUNDER & MANAGING DIRECTOR
BURCHEART PTY LTD
Though she initially tried, Sacha Burchgart couldn't escape the call of a career in financial advice; it just took staring down her own mortality to see what's possible when you do things differently. Jamie Williamson writes.
Expert Feed
How technology is turning tax complexity into client clarity
What used to be a relatively simple back-of-the-envelope calculation is now much more challenging, Morningstar says.
Why Australia's financial advisers will be more valuable in 10 years, not less
Despite a rise of innovative solutions across the wealth management sector, financial advisers will prove valuable for in-person advice.
What America's $1 trillion direct indexing boom tells us about the evolution of MAs
What Australia can learn from direct indexing, a tax-efficient form of managed accounts utilised in the US.
Stonepoint is another lesson in fund governance and investor protection
The demise of the Stonepoint Capital Fund may have gone under the radar for many, but proves an important point for independent governance when examined.
Changing the name of a document from Statement of Advice to Letters of Advice does absolutely nothing to improve communications between advisers and their clients.
Following the requirements of the Corps Act 2001, Ch 7, Subdivisions C & D instead of being slaves to ASIC requirements would immediately result in a simpler approach.
No-one is calling out ASIC for having introduced the complexity and confusion that now exists. Why not???
Simplifying the communications surrounding advice will not happen while bandaids are being applied. Someone needs to be intelligent enough to go back to source documents ie (Corps Act) and start again.
When I joined the financial advice industry as a (securities) adviser in 1986 'financial planning' was tagged as a new 'emerging' profession - 36 years later it's still 'emerging' and in fact it is arguably further away from emerging than it was back then!
As Sue commented, until somebody (hopefully the Productivity Commission) has the intellectual fortitude to differentiate the provision of advisory services (a 'professional' skill) from the financial 'product' issues (akin to the difference between a doctors diagnosis and then the proscription of a curing medicine) there is no hope for this industry.
Legislative changes to the authorising of Financial Advisers in 1992 ( and then the Managed Investment Act in 1994) were a clear 'wrong turn' at the time, embedding the control with the authorising body (an institution usually) - and haven't the likes of AMP, Westpac, NAB, CBA, etc. done just a dandy job with that!
ASIC has to work within the confines of the Corporations Act as Sue pointed out but they define everything they do within the terms of providing 'financial product advice' a clear indication they see provision of the advice and the product as one and the same thing. After 30+ years of watching ASIC and its fore bares in operation (and my direct involvement as the Responsible Manager for an AFSL), ASIC has demonstrated its complete failure as a regulatory body. Any role going forward for ASIC should just be confined to the enforcing /regulation of financial products and nothing to do with the provision of advice.