Solutions for a simpler, wellbeing-driven financial advice modelBY MATT BROWN | FRIDAY, 11 MAR 2022 8:14AMHow many financial advisers does it take to change a lightbulb? It's difficult to say because three are still doing the paperwork, two must go back to university and the others ... Upgrade your subscription to access this article
Join the growing community of financial advisers
with unlimited access to our latest news, research and analysis of the industry.
Become a premium subscriber today. |
Latest News
Former financial adviser charged in alleged $160k super fraud case
Former financial adviser Abdullah Popal has been charged with alleged fraud offences in Sydney's north-west, accused of hoodwinking five individuals out of over $160,000 from their self-managed super funds (SMSFs).
Reducing super tax cap to $2m 'a concern': FAAA
The FAAA has voiced concerns over the Labor government's proposed superannuation tax, saying if they are negotiating with the Greens, a reduction in the cap to $2 million would be problematic.
FAAA calls for stronger consumer protections in advice reforms
The Financial Advice Association of Australia (FAAA) has opposed collective charging for "always complex and costly" retirement planning advice and emphasised the need for consumer protection in the provision of super nudges in its submission to Treasury on the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes (DBFO) ...
Adviser numbers jump in March quarter: Rainmaker
The March quarter saw the highest number of financial advisers join the sector in the last seven years to reach 15,982, according to Rainmaker Information.
Further Reading
Cover Story

Moving mountains
MAGDELINE JACOVIDES
FOUNDER AND FINANCIAL ADVISER
MAZI WEALTH
FOUNDER AND FINANCIAL ADVISER
MAZI WEALTH
On top of running a successful practice, Mazi Wealth founder Deline Jacovides is a fierce advocate for closing the superannuation gender gap and has built a highly popular social media presence that takes financial literacy to the next level. She tells Karren Vergara where her passion comes from and how she integrates it all with family life.
Changing the name of a document from Statement of Advice to Letters of Advice does absolutely nothing to improve communications between advisers and their clients.
Following the requirements of the Corps Act 2001, Ch 7, Subdivisions C & D instead of being slaves to ASIC requirements would immediately result in a simpler approach.
No-one is calling out ASIC for having introduced the complexity and confusion that now exists. Why not???
Simplifying the communications surrounding advice will not happen while bandaids are being applied. Someone needs to be intelligent enough to go back to source documents ie (Corps Act) and start again.
When I joined the financial advice industry as a (securities) adviser in 1986 'financial planning' was tagged as a new 'emerging' profession - 36 years later it's still 'emerging' and in fact it is arguably further away from emerging than it was back then!
As Sue commented, until somebody (hopefully the Productivity Commission) has the intellectual fortitude to differentiate the provision of advisory services (a 'professional' skill) from the financial 'product' issues (akin to the difference between a doctors diagnosis and then the proscription of a curing medicine) there is no hope for this industry.
Legislative changes to the authorising of Financial Advisers in 1992 ( and then the Managed Investment Act in 1994) were a clear 'wrong turn' at the time, embedding the control with the authorising body (an institution usually) - and haven't the likes of AMP, Westpac, NAB, CBA, etc. done just a dandy job with that!
ASIC has to work within the confines of the Corporations Act as Sue pointed out but they define everything they do within the terms of providing 'financial product advice' a clear indication they see provision of the advice and the product as one and the same thing. After 30+ years of watching ASIC and its fore bares in operation (and my direct involvement as the Responsible Manager for an AFSL), ASIC has demonstrated its complete failure as a regulatory body. Any role going forward for ASIC should just be confined to the enforcing /regulation of financial products and nothing to do with the provision of advice.