Solutions for a simpler, wellbeing-driven financial advice modelBY MATT BROWN | FRIDAY, 11 MAR 2022 8:14AM How many financial advisers does it take to change a lightbulb? It's difficult to say because three are still doing the paperwork, two must go back to university and the others ... Upgrade your subscription to access this article
Join the growing community of financial advisers
with unlimited access to our latest news, research and analysis of the industry.
Become a premium subscriber today. |
Latest News
ASIC funding levy to charge advisers $46.2m
The financial advice sector can expect to contribute $46.2 million to ASIC's industry funding levy for the 2025 financial year, new estimates show.
ASIC releases new relief for reportable situations regime
ASIC has provided AFSLs new reliefs to help them manage the reportable situations regime, which includes extending the length of investigations reportable from 30 days to 60 days.
TA Associates invests in Viridian Financial Group
TA Associates announced it will make an undisclosed investment in Viridian Financial Group to help the latter accelerate its next phase of growth.
Shaw and Partners splashes $63m for New Zealand expansion
Shaw and Partners Financial Services, a subsidiary of EFG International, has acquired a 75% stake in Auckland-based Investment Services Group (ISG) for NZ$67.5 million ($62.5m).
Further Reading
Cover Story
Moving mountains
MAGDELINE JACOVIDES
FOUNDER & FINANCIAL PLANNER
MAZI WEALTH
FOUNDER & FINANCIAL PLANNER
MAZI WEALTH
On top of running a successful practice, Mazi Wealth founder Deline Jacovides is a fierce advocate for closing the superannuation gender gap and has built a highly popular social media presence that takes financial literacy to the next level. She tells Karren Vergara where her passion comes from and how she integrates it all with family life.
Expert Feed
The need to achieve real scale in advice - and serve all Australians
One of the great social challenges in financial services today is the millions of everyday Australians who want and need financial guidance but cannot ...
Are US assets becoming less desirable?
There has been so much commentary, including by us, on the twists and turns of US trade policy - notwithstanding the latest 90-day truce with China - ...
Listed private equity: A strategic opportunity amid global market dislocation
The sharp escalation in global trade tensions in 2025 has injected a fresh layer of volatility into capital markets.
How to manage the rise of 'early' inheritances
For decades, financial advice around wealth transfers has largely focused on estate planning and the distribution of assets after death. However, a significant ...
Changing the name of a document from Statement of Advice to Letters of Advice does absolutely nothing to improve communications between advisers and their clients.
Following the requirements of the Corps Act 2001, Ch 7, Subdivisions C & D instead of being slaves to ASIC requirements would immediately result in a simpler approach.
No-one is calling out ASIC for having introduced the complexity and confusion that now exists. Why not???
Simplifying the communications surrounding advice will not happen while bandaids are being applied. Someone needs to be intelligent enough to go back to source documents ie (Corps Act) and start again.
When I joined the financial advice industry as a (securities) adviser in 1986 'financial planning' was tagged as a new 'emerging' profession - 36 years later it's still 'emerging' and in fact it is arguably further away from emerging than it was back then!
As Sue commented, until somebody (hopefully the Productivity Commission) has the intellectual fortitude to differentiate the provision of advisory services (a 'professional' skill) from the financial 'product' issues (akin to the difference between a doctors diagnosis and then the proscription of a curing medicine) there is no hope for this industry.
Legislative changes to the authorising of Financial Advisers in 1992 ( and then the Managed Investment Act in 1994) were a clear 'wrong turn' at the time, embedding the control with the authorising body (an institution usually) - and haven't the likes of AMP, Westpac, NAB, CBA, etc. done just a dandy job with that!
ASIC has to work within the confines of the Corporations Act as Sue pointed out but they define everything they do within the terms of providing 'financial product advice' a clear indication they see provision of the advice and the product as one and the same thing. After 30+ years of watching ASIC and its fore bares in operation (and my direct involvement as the Responsible Manager for an AFSL), ASIC has demonstrated its complete failure as a regulatory body. Any role going forward for ASIC should just be confined to the enforcing /regulation of financial products and nothing to do with the provision of advice.