The wealth divide: Why Australia must re-think its 'sophisticated investor' lawsBY JESSE HAMILTON | FRIDAY, 10 MAY 2024 1:24PMIn a country that values fairness, it's time we asked why our government's investment laws are still stacked against everyday Australians. It has been reported that the government ... Upgrade your subscription to access this article
Join the growing community of financial advisers
with unlimited access to our latest news, research and analysis of the industry.
Become a premium subscriber today. |
Latest News
NCAs unlikely to solve retirement advice gap: HUB24, CFS
|HUB24 and Colonial First State (CFS) say the New Class of Advisers (NCA) will unlikely solve the retirement advice gap Australians face, noting the focus needs to be on helping reduce friction for those with complex advice needs.
Advised cover faces claims data test
Group superannuation insurance appears to outperform individual advised cover on some claim's measures, raising questions about the value of advice when it comes to protecting clients against disability.
ASIC stalls Sequoia bid to ditch cross guarantee deed
ASIC is again putting up roadblocks to Sequoia Financial Group's attempt to revoke the deed of cross guarantee with InterPrac Financial Planning, asking more questions and requesting more information before the group rids itself of all liabilities arising from the Shield and First Guardian disaster.
Praemium's new leadership toughens earnings yardstick
Praemium's new leadership will be keeping a close eye on costs, with new chief executive Denis Orrock noting he will make sure the technology upgrade underway translates into stronger earnings and better returns for shareholders.
Further Reading
Cover Story

Advice with soul
SACHA BURCHGART
FOUNDER & MANAGING DIRECTOR
BURCHEART PTY LTD
FOUNDER & MANAGING DIRECTOR
BURCHEART PTY LTD
Though she initially tried, Sacha Burchgart couldn't escape the call of a career in financial advice; it just took staring down her own mortality to see what's possible when you do things differently. Jamie Williamson writes.









The current testing is clearly biased towards the wealthy...or those who haven't divorced. It completely ignores people who might previously have qualified based on investible assets, who have gone through a financial settlement. Anyone who's gone through a divorce can tell you it's a wonderful way to destroy wealth!
It must be asked, how is it that people with financial services qualifications are excluded from the current definition used?
The test to which this refers is not the only test. A licensee is also entitled to assess a client's sophistication. See Corporations Act s708(10) and s761GA. it would appear that the advisers/licensees do not want to perform the assessment and take on the obligation.