Equities managers should manage equities, not cashBY JOHN DYALL | FRIDAY, 18 MAY 2018 2:53PMAnyone looking at the performance league tables of managed investment products would think it was all about performance, and that performance was a signifier of skill. But performance ... Upgrade your subscription to access this article
Join the growing community of financial advisers
with unlimited access to our latest news, research and analysis of the industry.
Become a premium subscriber today. |
Latest News
HNW clients value quality over fees: Praemium
High-net-worth (HNW) Australians who receive ongoing financial advice are more confident in their investments than those managing their wealth alone, new research from Praemium and CoreData found.
TAL launches new campaign focused on mental health
TAL has launched a new campaign, working with youth media group The Daily Aus, and partners with the AFLW, aimed at promoting mental wellbeing.
Selfwealth expands into full-fledged wealth platform
Trading platform Selfwealth has launched three managed portfolios, expanding from online brokerage into a wealth platform.
Adviser increase the 'strongest' since FY20: Padua WealthData
The number of financial advisers has risen to 15,169, with net gains of six new members this week, according to Padua WealthData's analysis.
Further Reading
Cover Story

Advice with soul
SACHA BURCHGART
FOUNDER & MANAGING DIRECTOR
BURCHEART PTY LTD
FOUNDER & MANAGING DIRECTOR
BURCHEART PTY LTD
Though she initially tried, Sacha Burchgart couldn't escape the call of a career in financial advice; it just took staring down her own mortality to see what's possible when you do things differently. Jamie Williamson writes.









John,
RE: "Fundamentally, they are being hired to manage a portfolio of equities, not to time the market." As an adviser I would disagree, managers such as Montgomery, Pengana and Allan Gray are paid to manage client's money and obtain the best return while minimising loss (something clients are very concerned about). A manager who has to be fully invested in the underlying asset class in this case equities is investing regardless of valuation. If a manager can't find a stock to invest in that meets their return and risk criteria then I am happier for them to hold more cash until they can. The comparison to the benchmark is not relevant, noting that all index funds under perform the benchmark and you will note that longer term performance of funds like Montgomery and Pengana is superior than the benchmark.
G'day John,
I really think you have put a solid case forward. Current market conditions and client profile however are partly responsible for strengthening your arguments.
In 2010 we launched the (also eponymously named) Montgomery [Private] Fund, which has $1 million minimum and the flexibility to hold 100% cash! The fund counts as its clients some of the nation's wealthiest individuals and families for whom capital preservation is paramount. Indeed when markets fall 30%, they would not be delighted to hear from a manager who says their fund "only" fell 27%.
Back in 2011 and 2012 the markets went backwards and the number of domestic funds that generated positive returns could be counted on one hand. The Montgomery [Private] Fund was amongst them and its clients are extremely appreciative. There are advisers who prefer all their managers to be fully invested at all times, and the cash allocation decision can be made elsewhere. But I reckon the guys at the coal face are best qualified to decide when to be fully invested or otherwise.
Current market conditions are unusual and the period of overvaluation has been extended by unprecedented central bank intervention, but as Herb Stein famously observed; "if something can't go on forever, it must stop". The debate 'for' and 'against' holding cash should not be had while the mountain climber stands on the summit. We should wait until he climbs back down and gets back to base camp safely.