Why active performance tests are stupidBY JOHN DYALL | SUNDAY, 7 AUG 2022 2:09PMEverybody does it. Even me. It's nothing to be ashamed of. It's not even illegal. It's answering the question "Does active management outperform" by putting all active ... Upgrade your subscription to access this article
Join the growing community of financial advisers
with unlimited access to our latest news, research and analysis of the industry.
Become a premium subscriber today. |
Latest News
HNW clients value quality over fees: Praemium
High-net-worth (HNW) Australians who receive ongoing financial advice are more confident in their investments than those managing their wealth alone, new research from Praemium and CoreData found.
TAL launches new campaign focused on mental health
TAL has launched a new campaign, working with youth media group The Daily Aus, and partners with the AFLW, aimed at promoting mental wellbeing.
Selfwealth expands into full-fledged wealth platform
Trading platform Selfwealth has launched three managed portfolios, expanding from online brokerage into a wealth platform.
Adviser increase the 'strongest' since FY20: Padua WealthData
The number of financial advisers has risen to 15,169, with net gains of six new members this week, according to Padua WealthData's analysis.
Further Reading
Cover Story

Advice with soul
SACHA BURCHGART
FOUNDER & MANAGING DIRECTOR
BURCHEART PTY LTD
FOUNDER & MANAGING DIRECTOR
BURCHEART PTY LTD
Though she initially tried, Sacha Burchgart couldn't escape the call of a career in financial advice; it just took staring down her own mortality to see what's possible when you do things differently. Jamie Williamson writes.









The issue in my opinion is, research houses demanding that an active manager benchmark against an index, which usually is the S&P/ASX200 or 300 or MSCI world ex Aust., instead of what the active manager's stated objective is to deliver.
We need to have research houses measure the active managers against their stated objective not an index.